Recently, the head of the UK branch of G4S, the largest private security firm in the world, predicted that within the next few years an increasing amount police work will be allocated and outsourced to private security companies – like G4S.

The comments were made by the director of the UK led private security firm, off the back of G4S having secured lucrative contracts to carry out policing duties on behalf of West Midlands and Surrey police – and ultimately the taxpayer.

One of the immediate criticisms raised at this prospect was of the need for all individuals contracted to carry out police duties to be held equally accountable to the IPCC (Independent police complaints commission) – at present this will not the case.

G4S are also set to have a massive presence at this year’s Olympic Games, with around 13,000 staff allocated for the games which are set to begin in a couple of weeks time. Mainstream news reports have described the makeup of east London as looking increasingly more like an occupied military zone rather than the sight for one of the greatest spectacles on Earth. Coincidentally, we are talking about the same G4S that carries out duties for the Israeli government and the Israeli Defense Force (IDF).

Despite concerns raised over the last couple of days regarding the ability of G4S to deliver, the Home Secretary Theresa May today maintained that the Olympic games were safe to go ahead and that london is prepared.

Indeed, the security giant looks likely to secure lucrative contracts to undergo outsourced work on behalf of the NHS, and the police, and post Olympics, and does not look likely to be struggling for work, to put it politely.

Police forces across the country, as well as suffering from acute levels of public skepticism, and diminishing resources, will be headed by a company, driven by profit margins at the behest of our government.

Although according to government this is of course done in the name of efficiency and cost effectiveness, one might say that there is a direct conflict of interest. If we were to make any predictions as to how this were to translate into reality, looking at how the police, immigration officials, and prisons which have been privatised are operating in the US, and the resulting criticisms that have been leveled at them, we ought to surely be concerned.

Incidentally, here in the UK, we have already emulated the private prison system, with several currently outsourced to private companies.

In addition to the news that the police along with our other institutions, will now be further privatised and sold off, we have also had to digest the added revelation that we are likely to see an even greater drop in police numbers in the years leading up to 2015.

If alarm bells were not already ringing as a result of the fragility of the relationship between the police and the public, then they should be now.

There is no reason to believe that this will have a beneficial effect on the level of service provided. Or put another way, there is no evidence to suggest that in the long run this will benefit society. On the contrary many are voicing concerns saying the opposite; A climate under which it becomes more profitable to imprison people than to educate them, is not something we want. We only have to look across the pond to realise that.

Equally, the likes of G4S, securing the Olympics and carrying out increasingly more and more police duties holds just as many legitimate concerns.

As was revealed in a recent report, the extent to which some of the private companies awarded contracts to kickstart the coalition governments ‘work programme’ sought to actually cut the number of claimants claiming benefits- including G4S – was shockingly high. Many are concerned that they are more focused on cutting the number of benefit claimants, rather than actually getting people back to work.

Many groups and activists concerned about G4S have been trying to raise awareness and scrutinize G4S for many years, but in recent months and especially in the aftermath of the death of Jimmy Mubenga, which for many after a long list of incidents which brought into sharp focus the prospect of criminal charges being sought for possible criminal behaviour by G4S, that scrutiny has increased – and with good reason. Whether the staff that held Mubenga in their custody will now face criminal charges remains to be seen. It also remains to be seen whether the company itself will face criminal charges of manslaughter.

Just like the last New Labour government, which designated the contract for our census data to be gathered to Lockheed Martin, the arms manufacturer, with many other impressive titles to its name to boot, this coalition hasn’t flinched from its predictable ideological course, in shipping the important work of our already stretched institutions, over to private companies, and the reality is that we are poised to see more of the same. The fact that one of the big beneficiaries of this, has massive question marks hanging over it says much about our government’s willingness to ship out anything to the highest bidder, irrespective of the spin, which justifies such decision making in the name of cost effectiveness and efficiency. The question really, is what’s coming next.

Meanwhile the Olympics are awaited with bated breath from many and for many reasons. For sports lovers it’s the chance to enjoy the games the chance to inspire young people. For many police officers, the circumstances surrounding the Olympics, are just inviting the kind of scenes and trouble that we saw last year, possibly further rioting. Private companies, just like the big multinationals that go in to rebuild a destroyed infrastructure after a war, are poised to get rich either way.

Find this story at 13 July 2012

By Richard Sudan
Notebook – A selection of Independent views -, Opinion
Friday, 13 July 2012 at 12:00 am

Army called upon to fill Games security shortfall
Fears G4S may even fail to meet reduced target
MP accuses firm – who were paid £284m – of letting the country down

The security firm G4S was reportedly paid a staggering £284million to provide up to 17,500 personnel for the 2012 Games.

But yesterday, in a major humiliation for company bosses and Olympic organisers, it admitted it would fall well short of the target, forcing ministers to pull in thousands of military personnel.

The company was contracted to provide a minimum of 15,400 security staff, with a target of 17,500.

Yesterday, as the Government confirmed the call-up of 3,500 extra troops, G4S claimed it would be able to bring in 13,800.

However, with 14 days to go to the Games, question marks remained whether it would meet even that target, as just a small fraction of that total is available for deployment. Only 4,000 are ‘boots on the ground’, working as ticket checkers and bag searchers at the Olympic Park in Stratford, east London.

Another 9,000 are still in the training and vetting process – raising fears even the more reduced target might not be achievable.

The Armed Forces now make up the overwhelming majority of the security staff likely to be deployed during the Games.

The original plan for 7,500 military is bolstered by a special contingent of 5,000, plus the 3,500 announced on Tuesday, making a total of 16,000. In addition, there will be 3,000 unpaid volunteers.

The number of staff needed to guard the Olympic venues more than doubled last December after the organising committee Locog wildly underestimated the total required. Originally Locog contracted G4S to provide 2,000 security guards, but in December the firm agreed to increase that number massively.

Yesterday Downing Street insisted there would be financial penalties for the firm for failing to meet the contract. But Locog refused to comment on the nature of any fines, claiming it would breach commercial confidentiality. That is despite taxpayers coughing up at least £9billion for the cost of the Games.

Insiders said the company had repeatedly claimed until last week that it would meet its obligations.

A Whitehall source accused the firm of ‘abysmal’ failure and said it had delayed completing training and vetting processes to save money by not having too many staff on the books before the start of the Games.

The source said: ‘Until yesterday officials from G4S were turning up and assuring us that the figures were getting better and going to be OK.

‘Then we learn there’s not as many as we need. They didn’t want to be throwing money at the problem six months ago because their staff would be sitting around doing nothing.’

Home Secretary Theresa May was hauled to the House of Commons to try to explain the shortfall.

She insisted: ‘There is no question of Olympic security being compromised.’

But Labour MP Keith Vaz, who called for the emergency statement, said: ‘G4S has let the country down and we have literally had to send in the troops.’

Mr Vaz, chairman of the Commons Home Affairs Committee, has written to Nick Buckles, chief executive of G4S, demanding he give evidence before MPs next week.

The debacle is the latest blow to the reputation of G4S which, while relatively unknown to the public, is one of the world’s biggest security companies.

In recent years its tentacles have extended into swathes of British life which used to be the preserve of the public sector, including running prisons and police custody suites.

From headquarters in Crawley, Sussex, company bosses run a sprawling multinational company with interests in more than 125 countries.

They provide security at Heathrow and other major airports, and for vans transporting cash on behalf of banks and other financial institutions.

Under its previous name Group4Security it had a contract for transporting prisoners, but in 2004 the company ‘lost’ two prisoners, sparking a major investigation.

It runs six jails in the UK including Birmingham, where an inspection report in October 2011 said drugs were regularly being thrown over the prison walls.

Three G4S guards are on police bail over the death in October 2010 of Angolan national Jimmy Mubenga, who was restrained while being deported from the country.

…

Find this story at 13 July 2012

By Jack Doyle

PUBLISHED: 22:39 GMT, 12 July 2012 | UPDATED: 10:30 GMT, 13 July 2012

Published by Associated Newspapers Ltd

Part of the Daily Mail, The Mail on Sunday & Metro Media Group
© Associated Newspapers Ltd

The depth of the crisis over G4S’s Olympic security preparations became increasingly clear on Thursday as recruits revealed details of a “totally chaotic” selection process and police joined the military in bracing themselves to fill the void left by the private security contractor.

Guards told how, with 14 days to go until the Olympics opening ceremony, they had received no schedules, uniforms or training on x-ray machines. Others said they had been allocated to venues hundreds of miles from where they lived, been sent rotas intended for other employees, and offered shifts after they had failed G4S’s own vetting.

The West Midlands Police Federation reported that its officers were being prepared to guard the Ricoh Arena in Coventry, which will host the football tournament, amid concerns G4S would not be able to cover the security requirements.

“We have to find officers until the army arrives and we don’t know where we are going to find them from,” said Chris Jones, secretary of the federation.

G4S has got a £284m contract to provide 13,700 guards, but only has 4,000 in place. It says a further 9,000 are in the pipeline.

G4S sent an urgent request on Thursday to retired police asking them to help. A memo to the National Association of Retired Police Officers said: “G4S Policing Solutions are currently and urgently recruiting for extra support for the Olympics. These are immediate starts with this Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday and Friday available. We require ex-police officers ideally with some level of security clearance and with a Security Industry Association [accreditation], however neither is compulsory.”

Robert Brown, a former police sergeant, told the Guardian that he pulled out of the recruitment process for the Games after seeing it close at hand.

He said: “They were trying to process hundreds of people and we had to fill out endless forms. It was totally chaotic and it was obvious to me that this was being done too quickly and too late.”

Another G4S trainee, an ex-policeman, described the process as “an utter farce”.

He added: “There were people who couldn’t spell their own name. The staff were having to help them. Most people hadn’t filled in their application forms correctly. Some didn’t know what references were and others said they didn’t have anyone who could act as a referee. The G4S people were having to prompt them, saying things like “what about your uncle?”

Tim Steward, a former prison officer, said he was recruited by G4S in March as a team leader but said he would not be working at the Games because of a series of blunders.

Steward said he provided documentation for vetting but G4S had said it did not have the information on record and so closed his file. The security firm then offered him a training session at short notice, which he could not attend, but it did not offer an alternative.

A recruit who was interviewed in March and completed training last month, said: “There are people like me that are vetted and trained in security and would be happy to work, but can’t. Some of the classes were of around 200 in size with only two trainers accommodating the training for a class of this size.

“I am yet to hear from G4S regarding my screening, accreditation, uniform or even a rough start date. I know many people also who will be commencing work on 27 July who have had absolutely no scheduled on-site training. They are simply being chucked into their role on x-ray machines, public screening areas and even athlete screening areas.”

Another guard who has been trained as an x-ray operator, complained that he was unable to get through to G4S to find out when and where he was meant to be working, and was once left on hold on the phone for 38 minutes.

One student applicant said he had already spent £650 on travel and hotel bills to attend training and was now worried that, because he had not received any accreditation or rota from G4S, he might not be given the shifts that would enable him to cover those costs. He said he had expected to earn about £2,000 over the period of the Games.

G4S’s own Facebook page for new recruits is littered with similar complaints.

“They’ve placed me in Manchester and I want to work in London,” wrote Glenn Roseman. “Some idiot has changed my location, I’m never going to get any work now.”

Christian Smith complained: “I did the training course, passed, and got my own security industry association licence, only to fail G4S vetting. Two days after I got their letter, they rang me, and asked me what days I could work.”

…

Find this story at 13 July 2012 

Recruits tell of chaos over schedules, uniforms and training while ex-police officers asked to help out
Robert Booth and Nick Hopkins
The Guardian, Friday 13 July 2012

© 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.

Im Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV) sind nicht nur am 11.11.2011 V-Mann Akten mit Bezug zur rechtsextremen Szene vernichtet worden, sondern auch noch einige Tage danach. Das geht nach MONITOR-Informationen aus einem aktualisierten Schreiben des Bundesamts für Verfassungsschutz an das Bundesministerium des Inneren hervor. Deshalb wurde das Disziplinarverfahren gegen den zuständigen Referatsleiter ausgedehnt mit dem so wörtlich „Vorwurf, eine zweite rechtswidrige Aktenvernichtung ( ohne vorherige Prüfung der Akten) vorsätzlich veranlasst zu haben (..)“ Dazu erklärt das Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz gegenüber „Monitor“: Es seien 7 Operativakten in zwei zeitlich voneinander getrennten Schritten vernichtet worden.“

Dass es eine zweite Aktenvernichtung gegeben hat, hatte dem Schreiben zufolge ein BfV Mitarbeiter ausgesagt: Danach habe er „einige Tage nach dem 11.11. einen weiteren Aktenordner zufällig in der Aktenverwaltung gefunden.“ Der damit konfrontierte vorgesetzte Beamte habe „nach kurzem Durchblättern“, so der Zeuge, „sogleich dessen Vernichtung angeordnet.“

Über die anstehende Vernichtung von Akten waren offensichtlich viele Mitarbeiter im Verfassungsschutz informiert. Der zuständige Referatsleiter hatte per E-Mail nicht nur alle Mitarbeiter des Referats 2B unterrichtet, sondern auch seinen vorgesetzten Gruppenleiter, heißt es in dem Bericht. Der inzwischen zurückgetretene Verfassungsschutzpräsident Fromm hatte am 8.11. 2011 angeordnet, alle Unterlagen auf einen Zusammenhang mit den mutmaßlichen NSU–Terroristen Bönhardt, Zschäpe und Mundlos zu untersuchen.

Find this story at 12 July 2012

Find the program at 12 July 2012

Pressemeldung vom 12.07.2012:

Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz

Secret documents reveal British intelligence concerns and raise damaging questions about UK’s targeting of Gaddafi opponents
Britain already faces legal action over its involvement in the plot to seize Abdul Hakim Belhaj, who is now the military commander in Tripoli. Photograph: Francois Mori/AP

British intelligence believes the capture and rendition of two top Libyan rebel commanders, carried out with the involvement of MI6, strengthened al-Qaida and helped groups attacking British forces in Iraq, secret documents reveal.

The papers, discovered in the British ambassador’s abandoned residence in Tripoli, raise new and damaging questions over Britain’s role in the seizure and torture of key opponents of Muammar Gaddafi’s regime.

Britain is already facing legal actions over its involvement in the plot to seize Abdul Hakim Belhaj, leader of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) who is now the military commander in Tripoli, and his deputy, Sami al-Saadi. Both men say they were tortured and jailed after being handed over to Gaddafi.

The documents reveal that British intelligence believe the pair’s rendition boosted al-Qaida by removing more moderate elements from the insurgency’s leadership. This allowed extremists to push “a relatively close-knit group” focused on overthrowing Gaddafi into joining the pan-Islamist terror network.

One document, headed “UK/Libya eyes only – Secret”, showed the security services had monitored LIFG members since their arrival in Britain following a failed attempt to kill Gaddafi in 1996, and understood their aim was the replacement of his regime with an Islamic state.

The briefing paper, prepared by the security service for a four-day MI5 visit in February 2005, said that following the seizure of its two key leaders the year before the group had been cast into a state of disarray.

“The extremists are now in the ascendancy,” the paper said, and they were “pushing the group towards a more pan-Islamic agenda inspired by AQ [al-Qaida]”.

Their “broadened” goals, it continued, were now also the destabilisation of Arab governments that were not following sharia law and the liberation of Muslim territories occupied by the west.

The 58-page document, which included names, photographs and detailed biographies of a dozen alleged LIFG members in the UK, went on to highlight “conclusions of concern” in the light of these changes.

These included the sending of money and false documents to a contact in Iran to help smuggle fighters into Iraq, where British and US forces were coming under fierce attack. “UK members have long enjoyed a reputation as the best suppliers of false documents in the worldwide extremist community,” said the report. It added that British LIFG members were becoming “increasingly ambitious” at fundraising through fast-food restaurants, fraud, property and car dealing, and raised nearly all the money for the group outside of Libya.British security also asked Gaddafi’s security forces for access to detainees and their debriefs.

Asked about the document, a Foreign Office spokesman said: “It is the government’s longstanding policy not to comment on intelligence matters.”

The LIFG eventually merged with al-Qaida in 2007. However, a second document, a secret update on Libyan extremist networks in the UK from August 2008, says the response of British members was “subdued and mixed”.

It concluded that those already supporting the wider aims of al-Qaida continued to do so, but “those with reservations retain their focus on Libya”. It added, however, that some money raised by members in Manchester may have gone to “assist operational activity”.

The cache of confidential documents – which included private letters to Gaddafi from Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and key Downing Street aides – was abandoned when the three-story residence was attacked by Gaddafi loyalists in April. .

There was also a dossier prepared by British intelligence with suggested questions for the captured men. The 39-page document, entitled Briefs for Detainees and labelled “UK Secret” on each page, was written in three sections in March, June and October 2004.

The first section is dated the month of Belhaj’s arrest, and sought answers on everything from his private life to his military training, activities in Afghanistan and links to al-Qaida. There were also personalised questions for Saadi.

The LIFG, founded by veterans of the mujahideen’s war against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, was for many years the most serious internal threat to Gaddafi, coming close to blowing up the dictator with a car bomb in his home town of Sirte in 1996. The government denied claims by David Shayler, the renegade British spy, that this assassination attempt was funded by British intelligence.

After Gaddafi’s clampdown on the group, dozens of dissidents were allowed to settle in Britain. London only designated the LIFG a terrorist organisation after Libya said it was abandoning its weapons of mass destruction programme in 2003. The move is understood to have been agreed as part of the negotiations with Gaddafi’s regime that paved the way to the controversial Blair deal.

Belhaj, now a key figure in liberated Libya, is preparing to sue Britain after other documents discovered in the wake of Gaddafi’s fall indicated that MI6 assisted in his rendition to torture and brutal treatment from the CIA and Gaddafi’s regime.

MI6 informed the CIA of his whereabouts after his associates told British diplomats in Malaysia he wanted to claim asylum in Britain.

He was allowed to board a flight to London, then abducted when his aircraft landed at Bangkok.

…

Find this story at 24 October 2011 

Ian Birrell
guardian.co.uk, Monday 24 October 2011 20.28 BST

© 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.

Committee says there are questions about whether agencies should have been able to anticipate how events might unfold
Britain’s intelligence agencies were surprised by the Arab spring, and their failure to realise unrest would spread so rapidly may reveal a lack of understanding of the region, according to the parliamentary body set up to scrutinise their activities.

A particularly sharp passage of the intelligence and security committee’s (ISC) report describes as “ill-considered” an attempt by MI6 to smuggle into Libya two officers who were promptly seized by rebels.

The report says that at the time the Arab spring erupted, both MI6 and GCHQ, the government’s electronic eavesdropping centre, were cutting resources devoted to Arab countries.

The criticism of MI6’s attitude is all the more significant given the agency’s traditional close ties with the Arab world.

The ISC, chaired by the former Conservative foreign secretary Sir Malcolm Rifkind, said it was understandable that the intelligence agencies were taken by surprise, “as indeed were the governments in the countries affected”.

However, it said there were questions about whether the agencies “should have been able to anticipate how events might subsequently unfold, and whether the fact that they did not realise that the unrest would spread so rapidly across the Arab world demonstrates a lack of understanding about the region”.

SAS troops escorted MI6 officers to Libya in a Chinook helicopter and dropped them off at a desert location south of Benghazi in the middle of the night in March 2011. The mission was an embarrassment to the British government and the anti-Gaddafi rebels alike. MI6 “misjudged the nature and level of risk involved”, the ISC said.

It noted that the lessons had been taken seriously by MI6, and added: “We would have expected nothing less.” The incident “demonstrates a lack of operational planning that we would not have expected from [MI6]and other participants”, it said.

Cuts being made in Whitehall’s defence intelligence staff mean greater risks would have to be taken “when reacting to the next crisis than was the case with the Libya campaign”, the ISC warned. It said GCHQ’s difficulties in retaining internet and cyber specialists attracted by higher salaries in the private sector was a matter of grave concern.

The report said Jonathan Evans, head of MI5, had told the ISC there had been “very considerable erosion of al-Qaida’s senior leadership capability in Pakistan, and to some extent now in Yemen, as a result of drone strikes”.

Al-Qaida had to spend a lot of its time trying to protect itself, Evans was quoted as saying. “It is much more difficult to take action if you are permanently in fear that you are going to be attacked. I think that has had a strategic impact on al-Qaida’s senior leadership.”

The ISC said British intelligence agencies were now concerned that al-Qaida in Iraq “may gain a lasting foothold in Syria if there is a prolonged power vacuum, and also at the prospect of Syrian conventional and chemical weapons stockpiles falling into the hands of terrorist groups”.

…

Find this story at 12 july 2012

Richard Norton-Taylor
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 12 July 2012 17.26 BST

© 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.

Defence lawyer files motion that ‘aiding the enemy’ charge is stricter against US soldiers than it would be against terrorists
The lawyer defending Bradley Manning against charges that he “aided the enemy” by disclosing state secrets to the whistleblower website WikiLeaks, is arguing that US soldiers are being treated more harshly in application of the law than terrorists.

David Coombs, the civilian lawyer who has been representing the soldier for the past two years after he was arrested in Iraq on suspicion of being the WikiLeaks source, will be pressing his case in a military court next week. In a motion that he has lodged with the court as part of the lead up to a full court martial, he warns that unless the “aiding the enemy” charge is clarified it would leave Manning in a more onerous legal position than terrorists facing exactly the same count.

“It defies all logic to think that a terrorist would fare better in an American court for aiding the enemy than a US soldier would,” Coombs writes in the motion.

Aiding the enemy is the most serious of the 22 counts that Manning is facing. In the rank of military charges, it is rated very close to treason and technically carries the death penalty, though the prosecution in this case have indicated that they will not push for that.

The charge alleges that between November 2009 and 27 May 2010, when Manning was arrested at a military base outside Baghdad, he “knowingly gave intelligence to the enemy through indirect means”. In court deliberations, it has been further clarified that the charge refers to the transmitting of “classified documents to the enemy through the WikiLeaks website”.

The US government has added in later legal debate that the “enemy” to which it is referring is al-Qaida and al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, as well as a terrorist group whose identity has not been made public.

The allegations relate to the passing of hundreds of thousands of US state secrets, including embassy cables from around the world and war logs from Iraq and Afghanistan, that caused a worldwide sensation when they were published by WikiLeaks via several international news organisations led by the Guardian.

Next week the soldier and his defence team will be back in military court in Fort Meade, Maryland, in the latest of a succession of pre-trial hearings to hammer out the terms of the eventual court martial. Previous engagements have led to sparky interactions between Coombs and the army prosecutors seeking to condemn Manning possibly to spending the rest of his life in military custody.

The most significant discussion at next week’s proceedings will revolve around the precise legal definition of what “aiding the enemy” means – specifically its allegation that Manning “knowingly gave intelligence to the enemy”. The judge presiding over Manning’s trial, Colonel Denise Lind, has ruled that the soldier must have had “actual knowlege” that he was giving intelligence to enemy for the charge to be proven.

Coombs will next week attempt to gain further clarification that would raise the legal bar much higher. In his motion he argues that it is a truism in the age of the internet, any posted material is potentially accessible to anybody.

To accuse Manning of having aided the enemy by transmitting intelligence to WikiLeaks that could then be accessed by al-Qaida would remove any sense of him “knowingly” doing so. He writes that this would “render the ‘actual knowledge’ element utterly toothless in all internet-intelligence
cases.”

Coombs highlights an apparent absurdity in the way the law is being applied. In cases where terrorist suspects are brought before military commissions, such as those at Guantanamo, and accused of the very same charge as Manning, the military prosecutors have to prove that the defendant “knowingly and intentionally” aided the enemy. Yet in the case of a US soldier, intentionality is not mentioned.

…

Find this story at 12 July 2012

Ed Pilkington in New York
guardian.co.uk, Thursday 12 July 2012 17.36 BST

© 2012 Guardian News and Media Limited or its affiliated companies. All rights reserved.

Die Ermittler gingen zunächst davon aus, dass die Zwickauer Terrorzelle im Herbst 1999 mit ihrer Serie von Raubüberfällen begann. Doch laut einem Untersuchungsbericht des sächsischen Innenministeriums steht nun fest: Bereits 1998 erbeuteten Uwe Böhnhardt und Uwe Mundlos 30.000 Mark.

Dresden – Die Überfallserie der Neonazi-Terroristen Uwe Böhnhardt und Uwe Mundlos hat noch im Jahr ihres Untertauchens 1998 begonnen. Das sächsische Innenministerium bestätigte in seinem am Mittwoch bekannt gewordenen Abschlussbericht an den Innenausschuss des Landtags erstmals, dass auch ein Raubüberfall am 18. Dezember 1998 auf einen Edeka-Markt in Chemnitz auf das Konto der Rechtsterroristen geht. Dies habe ein Spurenabgleich ergeben. Über die Vermutung, der Raub gehe auf das Konto von Böhnhardt und Mundlos, hatte der SPIEGEL bereits Ende April berichtet.

Zuvor waren die Ermittler davon ausgegangen, dass Böhnhardt und Mundlos erst im Oktober 1999 den ersten mehrerer Raubüberfälle begingen, um mit der Beute ihr Leben im Untergrund zu finanzieren. Nach Angaben von LKA-Präsident Jörg Michaelis betrug die Beute seinerzeit rund 30.000 D-Mark. Es seien zwei Schüsse abgefeuert worden, dem “Nationalsozialistischen Untergrund” (NSU) habe die Tat durch später gefundene Patronenhülsen zugeordnet werden können.

Böhnhardt und Mundlos sind inzwischen tot. Gemeinsam mit ihrer Komplizin Beate Zschäpe – alle stammen aus Jena – sollen sie die Terrorgruppe NSU gebildet haben, die für zehn Morde verantwortlich gemacht wird. Opfer waren neun Menschen mit ausländischen Wurzeln und eine Polizistin. Gut 13 Jahre lang konnten die Rechtsterroristen unerkannt in Deutschland leben – vor allem in Sachsen.

Sachsen sieht keine eigenen Versäumnisse bei NSU-Ermittlungen

Die Schuld dafür sieht der Freistaat aber nicht bei sich. Nach heutigem Wissen seien “keine Versäumnisse innerhalb des polizeilichen Handelns zu erkennen”, heißt es in dem Bericht des Innenministeriums. Dem Verfassungsschutz wird darin attestiert, dass er von den Thüringer Behörden “nur unvollständig informiert” wurde. Es sei “nicht ersichtlich”, dass er “erfolgversprechende Maßnahmen” unterlassen habe.

…

Find this story at 27. Juni 2012, 17:36 Uhr

© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2012
Alle Rechte vorbehalten
Vervielfältigung nur mit Genehmigung der SPIEGELnet GmbH

Der italienische Geheimdienst hat den deutschen Verfassungsschutz laut einem Zeitungsbericht schon 2003 auf ein Netzwerk rechter Terrorzellen hingewiesen. Demnach pflegten deutsche Nazis intensive Kontakte ins Ausland.

Hamburg – Das Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz (BfV) soll laut “Berliner Zeitung” bereits vor Jahren konkrete Hinweise auf ein Netz rechter Terrorzellen in Deutschland erhalten haben. Das gehe aus einem Schreiben des italienischen Staatsschutzes AISI an das BfV vom 14. Dezember 2011 hervor.

In dem Schreiben verweise der italienische Dienst auf eine Information, die dem Kölner Bundesamt am 21. März 2003 übermittelt worden sein soll. Darin sei es um ein Treffen europäischer Neonazis im belgischen Waasmunster im November 2002 gegangen, bei dem italienische Rechtsextremisten “bei vertraulichen Gesprächen von der Existenz eines Netzwerks militanter europäischer Neonazis erfahren” hätten.

Aus dem AISI-Schreiben geht dem Bericht zufolge auch hervor, dass deutsche Neonazis insbesondere aus Bayern und Thüringen seit Jahren enge Beziehungen nach Italien pflegen. So habe etwa Ralf Wohlleben, der als mutmaßlicher Unterstützer der Zwickauer Terrorzelle in U-Haft sitzt, mehrfach an Treffen mit Gruppen wie “Skinhead Tirol – Sektion Meran” und “Veneto Fronte Skinheads” in Italien teilgenommen und Geld übergeben “für die Unterstützung von Kameraden, die sich in Schwierigkeiten befinden”.

2008 hätten zudem Südtiroler Skinhead-Gruppen dem AISI-Bericht zufolge bei einem Treffen mit deutschen Neonazis aus Bayern und Franken “über die Möglichkeit der Durchführung fremdenfeindlicher ‘exemplarischer Aktionen’ diskutiert und eine detaillierte Kartenauswertung vorgenommen, um Geschäfte ausfindig zu machen, die von außereuropäischen Staatsangehörigen geführt werden”.

…

hut/Reuters
NSU-Affäre: Verfassungsschützer manipulierten Dateien (01.07.2012)
NSU-Akten: Im Reißwolf des Verfassungsschutzes (28.06.2012)
Kampf gegen Rechts: Bundestag beschließt zentrale Neonazi-Datei (28.06.2012)
Zwickauer Zelle: Bundesanwalt übernahm – Verfassungsschutz löschte Akten (28.06.2012)
Untersuchungsbericht: NSU-Terroristen überfielen schon 1998 Supermarkt (27.06.2012)
Rechtsextremismus: Verfassungsschützer hatten zwölf Spitzel beim “Thüringer Heimatschutz” (23.06.2012)

Find this story at 2 July 2012

© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2012
Alle Rechte vorbehalten
Vervielfältigung nur mit Genehmigung der SPIEGELnet GmbH

Die vom Verfassungsschutz geschredderten V-Mann-Akten waren brisanter als zugeben. Einer der Spitzel war in die Suche nach dem NSU-Trio eingebunden.

BERLIN taz | Manchmal können Verfassungsschützer richtig kreativ sein. Eine groß angelegte Geheimdienstaktion tauften sie nach einem der schönsten Wanderwege Deutschlands im Thüringer Wald, dem 170 Kilometer langen Rennsteig.

Noch kreativer waren die Geheimdienstler aber bei der Wahl der Namen ihrer bezahlten Spitzel, die sie im Rahmen jener „Operation Rennsteig“ in der rechtsextremen Szene anwarben. Die Vorgabe war offenbar, dass die Decknamen all dieser V-Leute mit einem T beginnen müssen. Und deshalb bekamen sie Namen wie diese: „VM Treppe“, „VM Tonfarbe“, „VM Tinte“ oder „VM Tobago“.

Doch Kreativität bei der Namensfindung ist nicht das, was man von Behörden zuallererst erwartet, sondern vielmehr das, womit das Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz in Köln selbst auf seiner Internetseite wirbt: „Mit Vertrauen, Sicherheit.“

Das Vertrauen in die Sicherheitsbehörde aber war nach einer in den vergangenen Tagen bekannt gewordenen Vernichtung brisanter Akten auf einen Tiefstand gesunken. Weshalb Verfassungsschutzchef Heinz Fromm am Montag keine andere Wahl blieb als zurückzutreten.
Verbindung zum abgetauchten Terror-Trio

Den Verdacht, dass ausgerechnet am Tag des Auffliegens des Nationalsozialistischen Untergrunds (NSU) in seinem Amt potenziell relevante Informationen zu der rechten Terrorzelle vernichtet wurden, konnte Fromm nicht entkräften.

Informationen der taz belegen vielmehr, dass mindestens in einem Fall Akten zu einem V-Mann vernichtet wurden, der in die Suche nach dem 1998 abgetauchten Trio Uwe Mundlos, Uwe Böhnhardt und Beate Zschäpe eingebunden war – denjenigen also, die zehn Morde auf dem Gewissen haben.

Ein Referatsleiter des Bundesamts für Verfassungsschutz hatte im November 2011 sieben Akten zur „Operation Rennsteig“ vernichten lassen. Deren Inhalt betraf eine am 17. Juli 1996 gestartete konzertierte Aktion des Bundesamts für Verfassungsschutz, des Thüringer Landesamts und des Bundeswehrgeheimdiensts MAD.

Ziel der bis 2003 andauernden Operation war es, V-Leute in der Anti-Antifa-Ostthüringen und deren braunen Nachfolgetruppe „Thüringer Heimatschutz“ anzuwerben – in jenem Kameradschaftszusammenschluss also, dem die späteren NSU-Terroristen bis zu ihrem Untertauchen angehörten.

Acht V-Leute konnte das Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz anwerben, allesamt bekamen sie einen Tarnnamen, der mit einem T beginnt. Wichtige Teile dieser Akten wurden, wie nun bekannt geworden ist, am 11. November 2011 geschreddert – ausgerechnet an dem Tag, an dem der Generalbundesanwalt öffentlich bekannt gab, dass er die Ermittlungen gegen die Terrorzelle übernommen hat.
Geknickt und aufklärungsbereit

Gegenüber Verfassungsschutzchef Fromm soll der zuständige Referatsleiter die Aktenvernichtung, die er mit angeblich abgelaufenen Aufbewahrungsfristen begründete, aber erst vergangenen Mittwoch eingeräumt haben – fast acht Monate später.

Fromm wusste um die Brisanz des Vorgangs, leitete ein Disziplinarverfahren gegen den Mitarbeiter ein und versetzte ihn intern. Nach außen hin versuchte er die Wogen zu glätten, gab sich geknickt und aufklärungsbereit. „Nach meinem derzeitigen Kenntnisstand handelt es sich um einen Vorgang, wie es ihn in meiner Amtszeit bisher nicht gegeben hat“, ließ er sich am Wochenende zitieren. „Hierdurch ist ein erheblicher Vertrauensverlust und eine gravierende Beschädigung des Ansehens des Amtes eingetreten.“

Gleichzeitig versuchte Fromm aber die Bedeutung des Vorfalls hinter den Kulissen herunterzuspielen. „Keiner dieser V-Leute hatte eine Führungsfunktion im ’Thüringer Heimatschutz‘, die Quellen waren ausschließlich Randpersonen oder Mitläufer“, schrieb er dem Staatssekretär im Bundesinnenministerium, Klaus-Dieter Fritsche. Zugänge zu den drei späteren NSU-Mitgliedern seien „nicht erlangt“ worden.

Man wolle nun versuchen, aus anderen Akten den Inhalt der geschredderten Dokumente nachzuvollziehen, hieß es. Gleichwohl musste Fromm aber in seinem Schreiben eingestehen: „Die vernichteten Akten können voraussichtlich nicht mehr in vollem Umfang rekonstruiert werden.“
Mehr Brisanz als zunächst angenommen

Zunächst schien es noch, als wolle Verfassungsschutzchef Fromm im Amt bleiben. Doch am Wochenende wurde die Kritik immer lauter. Von einem „unglaublichen Vorgang“ sprach die FDP, von einem „Skandal“ redeten SPD und Linke. Die CSU forderte indirekt Fromms Rücktritt, und Grünen-Chef Cem Özdemir sagte: „Der Fisch stinkt vom Kopf her.“ Die Affäre einfach auf den Referatsleiter abzuwälzen war nicht mehr möglich. Am Montag schmiss der bald 64-jährige Heinz Fromm, der nächstes Jahr ohnehin in den Ruhestand gehen sollte, vorzeitig hin.

Sein Rücktritt erfolgte womöglich auch, weil in der Affäre noch viel mehr Brisanz steckt. Nach Informationen der taz spielte mindestens einer der V-Leute, dessen Akten nun geschreddert wurden, entgegen den Behauptungen Fromms durchaus eine Rolle bei der Suche nach dem mordenden Neonazi-Trio Mundlos, Böhnhardt und Zschäpe: Es handelt sich um den V-Mann, den das Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz unter dem Namen „Tarif“ führte.

Wer sich hinter dem Decknamen verbirgt, ist unbekannt. Doch wie aus streng geheimen Verfassungsschutzakten hervorgeht, war V-Mann „Tarif“ im Jahr 1999 in die Suche nach der NSU-Truppe eingebunden. Damals war den Diensten das Gerücht zu Ohren gekommen, dass die drei Gesuchten bei einem Neonazi in Niedersachsen unterkommen könnten oder dass dieser Mann den dreien die Flucht ins Ausland ermöglichen könnte.

…

 Find this story at 2 July 2012

von Wolf Schmidt

Alle Rechte vorbehalten. Für Fragen zu Rechten oder Genehmigungen wenden Sie sich bitte an lizenzen@taz.de

In pre-dawn darkness, a Toyota Land Cruiser skidded off a bridge in North Africa in the spring, plunging into the Niger River. When rescuers arrived, they found the bodies of three U.S. Army commandos — alongside three dead women.

What the men were doing in the impoverished country of Mali, and why they were still there a month after the United States suspended military relations with its government, is at the crux of a mystery that officials have not fully explained even 10 weeks later.

At the very least, the April 20 accident exposed a team of Special Operations forces that had been working for months in Mali, a Saharan country racked by civil war and a rising Islamist insurgency. More broadly, the crash has provided a rare glimpse of elite U.S. commando units in North Africa, where they have been secretly engaged in counterterrorism actions against al-Qaeda affiliates.

The Obama administration has not publicly acknowledged the existence of the missions, although it has spoken in general about plans to rely on Special Operations forces as a cornerstone of its global counterterrorism strategy. In recent years, the Pentagon has swelled the ranks and resources of the Special Operations Command, which includes such units as the Navy SEALs and the Army’s Delta Force, even as the overall number of U.S. troops is shrinking.

At the same time, the crash in Mali has revealed some details of the commandos’ clandestine activities that apparently had little to do with counterterrorism. The women killed in the wreck were identified as Moroccan prostitutes who had been riding with the soldiers, according to a senior Army official and a U.S. counterterrorism consultant briefed on the incident, both of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the matter.

The Army’s Criminal Investigation Command, which is conducting a probe of the fatal plunge off the Martyrs Bridge in Bamako, the capital of Mali, said it does not suspect foul play but has “not completely ruled it out.” Other Army officials cited poor road conditions and excessive speed as the likely cause of the 5 a.m. crash.

U.S. officials have revealed few details about the soldiers’ mission or their backgrounds, beyond a brief news release announcing their deaths hours after the accident.

In many countries, including most in Africa, Special Operations forces work openly to distribute humanitarian aid and train local militaries. At times, the civil-affairs assignments can provide credible cover for clandestine counterterrorism units.

But in Mali, U.S. military personnel had ceased all training and civil-affairs work by the end of March, about a week after the country’s democratically elected president was overthrown in a military coup.

The military’s Africa Command, which oversees operations on the continent, said the three service members killed were among “a small number of personnel” who had been aiding the Malian military before the coup and had remained in the country to “provide assistance to the U.S. Embassy” and “maintain situational awareness on the unfolding events.”

Megan Larson-Kone, a public affairs officer for the U.S. Embassy in Mali, said the soldiers had stayed in Bamako because they were “winding down” civil-
affairs programs in the aftermath of the coup while holding out hope “that things would turn around quickly” so they could resume their work.

Two of the soldiers, Capt. Daniel H. Utley, 33, and Sgt. 1st Class Marciano E. Myrthil, 39, were members of the 91st Civil Affairs Battalion, 95th Civil Affairs Brigade, which is based at Fort Bragg, N.C.

For two months after the crash, the U.S. military withheld the identity of the third soldier killed. In response to inquiries from The Washington Post, the Army named him as Master Sgt. Trevor J. Bast, 39, a communications technician with the Intelligence and Security Command at Fort Belvoir.

The Intelligence and Security Command is a little-known and secretive branch of the Army that specializes in communications intercepts. Its personnel often work closely with the military’s Joint Special Operations Command, which oversees missions to capture or kill terrorism suspects overseas.

During his two decades of service, Bast revealed little about the nature of his work to his family. “He did not tell us a lot about his life, and we respected that for security purposes,” his mother, Thelma Bast of Gaylord, Mich., said in a brief interview. “We never asked questions, and that’s the honest truth.”

Haven for Islamist militants

U.S. counterterrorism officials have long worried about Mali, a weakly governed country of 14.5 million people that has served as a refuge for Islamist militants allied with al-Qaeda.

With only 6,000 poorly equipped troops, the Malian armed forces have always struggled to maintain control of their territory, about twice the size of Texas. Repeated famines and rebellions by Tuareg nomads only exacerbated the instability.

About six years ago, the Pentagon began bolstering its overt aid and training programs in Mali, as well as its clandestine operations.

Under a classified program code-named Creek Sand, dozens of U.S. personnel and contractors were deployed to West Africa to conduct surveillance missions over the country with single-
engine aircraft designed to look like civilian passenger planes.

In addition, the military flew spy flights over Mali and other countries in the region with longer-range P-3 Orion aircraft based in the Mediterranean, according to classified U.S. diplomatic cables obtained by the anti-secrecy group WikiLeaks.

In what would have represented a significant escalation of U.S. military involvement in Mali, the Pentagon also considered a secret plan in 2009 to embed American commandos with Malian ground troops, diplomatic cables show.

Under that program, code-named Oasis Enabler, U.S. military advisers would conduct anti-terrorism operations alongside elite, American-trained Malian units. But the idea was rejected by Gillian A. Milovanovic, the ambassador to Mali at the time.

In an October 2009 meeting in Bamako with Vice Adm. Robert T. Moeller, deputy chief of the Africa Command, the ambassador called the plan “extremely problematic,” adding that it could create a popular backlash and “risk infuriating” neighbors such as Algeria.

Furthermore, Milovanovic warned that the U.S. advisers “would likely serve as lightning rods, exposing themselves and the Malian contingents to specific risk,” according to a State Department cable summarizing the meeting.

Moeller replied that he “regretted” that the ambassador had not been kept better informed and said Oasis Enabler was “a work in progress.” It is unclear whether the plan was carried out.

Since then, however, security in Mali has deteriorated sharply. After the coup in March, extremist Muslim guerrillas in northern Mali declared an independent Islamist state. They have imposed sharia law and have begun enforcing strict social codes that include compulsory beards for men and a ban on television.

In the fabled desert city of Timbuktu, al-Qaeda sympathizers have destroyed ancient mausoleums and attacked other shrines as part of a religious cleansing campaign. Western aid workers have abandoned the northern half of the country after a string of kidnappings.

Thousands of Malians have fled to refugee camps in neighboring countries.

A fatal plunge

The three soldiers riding through Bamako in April had rented their 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser from a local agency, according to written statements provided to The Post by the Special Operations Command at Fort Bragg.

Bast was in the driver’s seat and was headed south across the Martyrs Bridge. Preliminary investigative results determined that he lost control of the Land Cruiser, which broke through the bridge’s guard rail and landed in the river below.

Also in the vehicle were three Moroccan women, according to the Army’s statement. Contributing factors in the accident, the Army said, were limited visibility and “a probable evasive maneuver on the part of the vehicle’s driver to avoid impacting with slower moving traffic.”

The soldiers died of “blunt force trauma” when the vehicle landed upside down in the shallow river, crushing the roof, the Army said.

The Special Operations Command said it could not answer questions about where the soldiers were going, nor why they were traveling with the unidentified Moroccan women, saying the matter is under investigation.

Larson-Kone, the embassy spokeswoman, said the soldiers were on “personal, not business-related travel” at the time, but she declined to provide details. Officials from the Africa Command also said that they did not know who the women were, but they added in a statement: “From what we know now, we have no reason to believe these women were engaged in acts of prostitution.”

Coincidentally, the incident occurred less than a week after President Obama’s visit to a summit in Cartagena, Colombia, where U.S. military personnel and Secret Service agents became embroiled in a scandal involving prostitutes.

Little details not adding up

At least two of the soldiers in Mali had been trained as communications or intelligence specialists.

Bast, the master sergeant, was a ham radio hobbyist who originally joined the Navy before switching to the Army several years ago. An Army spokesman described him as a “communications expert” and said he was posthumously given the Meritorious Service Medal but declined to say why.

Myrthil was a native of Haiti who joined the Army two decades ago. Military officials released virtually no details about his service record.

Utley, the captain, was a Kentucky native who joined the Army in 2002 to work as a signals and communications officer but later transferred to the Special Forces.

Friends said he had expected to deploy to Afghanistan last summer but received last-minute orders to go to Africa instead. His Mali assignment was scheduled to end this spring but was extended, they said.

Three weeks after the coup, on April 11, Utley sent a brief e-mail to a friend from college, Chris Atzinger, to report that he was all right and that he would write more later.

…

Find this story at 9 July 2012

By Craig Whitlock, Monday, July 9, 3:04 AM

Dana Priest and Julie Tate contributed to this report.

© The Washington Post Company

A German intelligence agent was suspected of being involved in one of the immigrant murders attributed to the neo-Nazi terrorist group, a newspaper has claimed. All attempts to figure out his story have failed.

File shredding scandal leads to security reform – National (4 Jul 12)
Intelligence chief resigns over mistakes – National (2 Jul 12)
Intel ‘destroyed as Nazi terror group exposed’ – National (28 Jun 12)

The agent, named only as Andreas T., was in the internet cafe when the last victim of the National Socialist Underground (NSU) was shot – yet investigators have been unable to work out if he was involved.

Weekly paper Die Zeit says police suspected at the time he was involved in the murder of Halit Yozgat, a Kassel internet café worker, on April 6, 2006, but that the investigation was obstructed by the Hesse Office for the Protection of the Constitution – the state’s intelligence agency.

Andreas T. was in the café at the time of the murder and police later found three guns, shotgun shells, and a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf in his various homes.

Die Zeit reports that one Hesse investigator believed at the time that “a Hessian intelligence agent could have shot the young Yozgat.” Andreas T. was subsequently “intensively interrogated” and was “constantly caught contradicting himself.”

It was previously known that Andreas T. was in the internet café at the time of the murder. He claimed that Yozgat was shot behind his counter while he was in the back room, and that had he left the café without noticing anything untoward.

Investigators were reportedly puzzled by how Andreas T., who is over 6 feet 2 inches tall, could have overlooked the body and the blood on the counter.

Die Zeit also said that on the day of the killing Andreas T. held several phone calls with a far-right informant who had contact with the NSU’s network of sympathizers and helpers.

Andreas T.’s employer, the Hesse state intelligence agency, also reportedly obstructed the police investigation by failing to provide any information. He now works at the headquarters of the state government in Kassel, the paper said.

The latest revelations come after German Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich promised a wholesale reform of Germany’s security services following the botched investigations into the NSU murders.

These led on Monday to the resignation of Heinz Fromm, president of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), after 12 years in charge.

The Die Zeit article was written by Stefan Aust, former editor-in-chief of Der Spiegel, best known for “The Baader Meinhof Complex,” his history of the left-wing terrorist organization the RAF.

Find this story at 5 July 2012

The Local/bk

Published: 5 Jul 12 10:44 CET
Updated: 5 Jul 12 12:20 CET
Online: http://www.thelocal.de/national/20120705-43575.html

WASHINGTON — Spurred by complaints from women working for the CIA in war zones, the spy service is stepping up efforts to enforce what it calls a zero-tolerance policy on sexual harassment by supervisors and co-workers.

David Petraeus, the CIA director, sent a message to agency staff members last month to emphasize the initiative. He ordered a team of managers to meet with senior officers at stations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and possibly in Yemen, Somalia and other countries where the CIA has launched drone missile strikes against militants.

Petraeus also appointed a “counselor and investigator” to field sexual harassment complaints at those posts, CIA spokesman Preston Golson said.

The effort follows surveys of CIA officers in war zones in 2009 and 2011 by the agency’s office of medical services. The surveys, which sought “to capture perceptions” on a wide range of workplace issues, showed no improvement in alleged sexual harassment, Golson said in an email.

Numerous women, who were not identified in the surveys, reported having been harassed, often by supervisors, said two former CIA officials, who requested that they not be identified in discussing an internal matter. They did not know the numbers, and the CIA declined to provide them.

“This has been going on for years, but it seems to have become more serious,” one of the former officials said. “The agency has not come up with an effective tool to stop it.”

The majority of alleged incidents in the surveys “consisted of remarks or jokes of a sexual nature,” Golson said. “Survey results suggested that harassment of a more physical nature may also have occurred, but was not reported.”

Some CIA officials have been punished for sexual harassment in recent years, Golson said. He declined to disclose information about those cases, citing CIA policy of keeping personnel data secret.

A few have come to light, however. In 2010, for example, a senior manager in the National Clandestine Service, which conducts CIA operations, was forced to retire after he had an affair with a female subordinate and her husband complained toLeon E. Panetta, then the CIA director, the two former officials said.

Stories of sexual improprieties are infamous at some CIA stations, especially in high-stress areas. It is a civilian agency, and employees in war zones tend to work long hours, live in close quarters and let off steam by drinking alcohol after work.

Partly as a result of that, former CIA officers said, what would be considered workplace sexual impropriety at corporations and other government agencies has been tolerated at the CIA, and trysts between supervisors and employees are not unusual.

Ilana Sara Greenstein, who served as a CIA case officer in Iraq in 2004-05, said a senior manager who was responsible for her promotions “hit on me” when she worked at CIA headquarters.

“He was married, quite aggressive and wouldn’t take no for an answer,” Greenstein said. “I said no, and it put me in a really awkward position.”

Greenstein, who quit the CIA and is now a lawyer, didn’t file a complaint at the time “because you know that’s the end of your career,” she said. “It sounds cliche, but it’s an old boys’ network, and that kind of comes with the territory.”

…

Find this story at 4 July 2012

By Ken Dilanian, Los Angeles Times

3:04 PM PDT, July 4, 2012Advertisement

ken.dilanian@latimes.com

Times staff writer Brian Bennett contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2012, Los Angeles Times

Einem Medienbericht zufolge hat der italienische Geheimdienst den Bundesverfassungsschutz bereits 2003 auf ein Netz rechtsextremer Terrorzellen hingewiesen. Wegen der Vernichtung von Akten im Zusammenhang mit der „NSU“-Mordserie steht Verfassungsschutz-Präsident Fromm weiter in der Kritik.

Erklärungsbedarf: Der Präsident des Bundesamtes für Verfassungsschutz, Heinz Fromm (r.), und Thüringens Verfassungsschutzpräsident Thomas Sippel

Der Bundesverfassungsschutz hat einem Medienbericht zufolge offenbar im März 2003 Hinweise auf ein Netz rechtsextremer Terrorzellen in Deutschland erhalten. Die „Berliner Zeitung“ berichtete am Montag über ein Schreiben des italienischen Inlandsgeheimdienstes AISI an den Verfassungsschutz vom Dezember 2011, in dem auf ein Schreiben von März 2003 verwiesen werde.

Darin sei über ein Treffen europäischer Neonazis berichtet worden, auf dem italienische Rechtsextremisten „bei vertraulichen Gesprächen von der Existenz eines Netzwerks militanter europäischer Neonazis erfahren“ hätten. Dieses Netzwerk bilde eine „halb im Untergrund befindliche autonome Basis“ und sei in der Lage, „mittels spontan gebildeter Zellen kriminellen Aktivitäten nachzugehen“, zitierte die Zeitung aus dem Schreiben. In einem vertraulichen Zusammenhang seien in diesem Zusammenhang die Namen mehrerer ranghoher deutscher Rechtsextremisten genannt worden.

Aus dem Schreiben geht der „Berliner Zeitung“ zufolge außerdem hervor, dass deutsche Neonazis insbesondere aus Bayern und Thüringen seit Jahren enge Beziehungen nach Italien pflegen. Der rechtsextremen Zelle „Nationalsozialistischer Untergrund“ (NSU) werden in Deutschland neun Morde an Migranten sowie an einer Polizistin vorgeworfen.
Fromm weiter in der Kritik

Wegen der Aktenvernichtung im Zusammenhang mit der Mordserie durch die NSU haben Politiker nicht nur der Opposition unterdessen weitere Aufklärung sowie teils Konsequenzen an der Spitze des Verfassungsschutzes gefordert. Bundestagsvizepräsidentin Pau, für die Linkspartei Mitglied im NSU-Untersuchungsausschuss, äußerte am Sonntag in einer Mitteilung die Fragen: „Galt die Aktenschredderei im Verfassungsschutz als das kleinere Übel? Wenn ja, was wäre dann das größere?“ Dies sei offenbar der Inhalt der Akten gewesen.

Frau Pau sagte: „Möglicherweise waren Verfassungsschützer näher und länger am NSU-Mord-Trio dran, als bislang eingestanden wird. Das wäre ein Skandal sondergleichen.“ Auch der Parteivorsitzende der Grünen Cem Özdemir sagte: „Da kommen viele Fragezeichen auf, die dringend aufgearbeitet werden müssen.“ Özdemir befand, es reiche nicht aus, nur Beamte zu versetzen. „Der Fisch stinkt vom Kopf her.“

Der Zwickauer Neonazi-Zelle werden zehn Morde in ganz Deutschland angelastet

Der CDU-Innenpolitiker Clemens Binninger verlangte eine Offenlegung der Klarnamen von V-Leuten des Verfassungsschutzes. „Neben einer Rekonstruktion der Inhalte über andere Akten und einer Befragung von Zeugen muss der Untersuchungsausschuss in geeigneter Form Einblick in die Klarnamendatei der V-Leute ermöglicht werden“, erklärte der Unions-Obmann im NSU-Untersuchungsausschuss des Bundestages: „Wir müssen unbedingt eine Vorstellung bekommen, wer die V-Leute tatsächlich waren, die in den Akten beschrieben wurden.“

Der CSU-Innenpolitiker Stephan Mayer griff direkt den Präsidenten des Bundesamts für Verfassungsschutz, Heinz Fromm, an. Er sagte in der „Bild“-Zeitung: „Die Affäre wirft die Frage auf, ob Fromm den Verfassungsschutz noch im Griff hat. Das muss Konsequenzen haben.“ Der FDP-Obmann im NSU-Untersuchungsausschuss des Bundestags, Hartfrid Wolff, nannte den Vorgang im Südwestrundfunk (SWR) „sehr, sehr gravierend“.
Fromme: „Erheblicher Vertrauensverlust“

Fromm sagte der Zeitschrift „Der Spiegel“: „Nach meinem derzeitigen Erkenntnisstand handelt es sich um einen Vorgang, wie es ihn in meiner Amtszeit bisher nicht gegeben hat. Hierdurch ist ein erheblicher Vertrauensverlust und eine gravierende Beschädigung des Ansehens des Amtes eingetreten.“

…

Find this story at 01 July 2012  

Quelle: FAZ.NET mit AFP/dpa/löw.

© Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung GmbH 2012
Alle Rechte vorbehalten.